i'm still at work and have been whipping around the blogosphere. i grew tired of reading atrios comment boards and decided to head over to the internet headquarters of infamous hate-mongering facist ann coulter for a few laughs (i'm not linking to her site, because i don't want her getting any more hits courtesy of my blogging, but if you have to see it for yourself, a google search will direct you there easily). anyway, here's what i found, from an interview ann apparently had with a ny post reporter that never ran (it's from her side, so who knows if that actually happened, and of course, she most likely doctored her responses):
NY POST: Your characterization of liberals paints them as extremists. But with people like Pat Robertson telling us how God keeps telling him who He's angry at, isn't it fair to say that there are extremists on both sides?
A: Pat Robertson opposes capital punishment, opposed the impeachment of Bill Clinton and supports trade with China, just for starters. Seems like a pretty mixed bag to me. So what makes you call him extreme? That he believes he has dialogue with the Lord? Do liberals now call anyone who thinks this an "extremist"?
umm...yes. basically. talking to mythological father figures generally tends to register as extremist in my mind. am i alone on this one? not enough for you, ann? how about his claim of leg pressing 2,000 pounds, aka a ton? or his suggestion that we assassinate venezuelan leader hugo chavez? not extremist? oh yea, definitely not, ann.
7.05.2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Great site loved it alot, will come back and visit again.
»
Post a Comment